Christian Moraru composed an entry on “Intertextuality”
for The Routledge Encyclopedia of
Narrative Theory (2005) which gives an overview of the history of the
concept as well as an overview of different approaches to the concept and their
most prominent theorists.
First of all, Moraru differentiates between four different approaches
which can be divided further into two different categories. If a text A is incorporated
in any way in a text B, A, the ‘pretext’, can be seen as the ‘intertext’ as it
is the text that is worked into another text (1). Contrary, text B can be
regarded as the intertext, as it is the text incorporating another, and,
therefore, is the active agent in this intertextuality (2). A third approach
regards both, text A and B, to be ‘intertextually bound’ to each other which
makes both texts intertexts (3). The fourth and last approach mentioned by
Moraru regards all texts as intertexts (4). Approaches 1-3 describe an “interplay
of identifiable (Genette) or ‘traceable’ texts (Doležel)”, while the
fourth approach indicates a universality of intertextuality in literature.
The
subsection “Bakhtin’s legacy: cultural and ideological analyses of narrative
intertextuality” of the article takes reference to hypertext: “Once society,
history, and culture are seen as ‘texts’, intertextuality becomes central to
new Historicism, cultural studies and identity studies, post-colonial
scholarship, debates around globalised ‘network society’, the Internet, and
hypertext”. Moraru adds to this aspect
of intertextuality in the following subsection “Poststructualism and telling as
retelling”. Here, he focuses on the aspects of interactivity, remodelling and
referentiality. Oral literature, as in folktales or anecdotes, become a
narrative labyrinth and ultimately a linguistic maze in the course of telling
and retelling.
Moraru’s oral literature resembles Jorge Luis Borges’s notion of an infinitive
novel in his short story The Garden of
Forking Paths. Both characterise hypertext as a kind of labyrinth or maze
which poses the opposite of a linear text.
Moraru, Christian. “Intertextuality”. In:
Routledge Encyclopaedia of Narrative Theory. Ed. Herman, Davis, Manfred Jahn,
and Ryan. London New York: Routledge, 2005. Print.
S. Plum
S. Plum
No comments:
Post a Comment